Topic / Subject
Meghan King claims her ex Jim Edmonds once leaked her phone number to sex workers to harass her; Edmonds’ rep called the allegation “absurd,” per TMZ and Page Six.

TL;DR
This is ugly reality-TV divorce fallout with serious accusations — and it’s still disputed, with his side flatly denying it.

Key Details

• TMZ reports Meghan King accused Jim Edmonds of leaking her phone number to sex workers to harass her years ago, and says Edmonds’ rep denies it.
• Page Six reports the allegation appears in the context of a police report tied to harassing/threatening calls King said she received.
• Both stories frame this as a claim King made to authorities/media, not something independently proven in the coverage cited.
• The identity of whoever was behind the reported harassing calls is not confirmed in the cited reports.

Breakdown
When celebrity breakups go nuclear, the pattern is almost always the same: public claims, denials, and people trying to win the narrative. The difference here is the allegation itself — it’s not petty shade, it’s an accusation of intentional harassment.

According to TMZ, King says Edmonds leaked her number to sex workers to target her. Page Six adds that the claim is connected to what King said in the context of reporting harassing threats to police. Edmonds’ representative, per TMZ, rejected the allegation outright.

The important lane to stay in: “allegation” and “denial.” The reporting presented is not a final finding that proves who did what. It’s one side describing what they say happened, with the other side calling it nonsense.

If there are actual documents (police reports, texts, call logs), those details weren’t provided in the intake beyond the reporting summary — and the person responsible for the more recent harassment described is not identified as confirmed fact in the cited coverage.

What We Know

• Meghan King made the claim publicly (and/or in statements described to police, per Page Six’s framing).
• Jim Edmonds’ camp denies the allegation, per TMZ.
• The reporting ties the story to harassment claims King said she experienced.

What We Don’t Know

• Whether there is documentary evidence establishing who leaked the number (if anyone) in a way that can be independently verified.
• Who was behind the reported recent harassing/threatening calls referenced in the coverage cited.
• Whether any legal action followed from the reported police contact (not confirmed in the intake).

How Credible Is This?
Source quality: Tabloid/aggregated reporting (TMZ, Page Six), with mentions of a police-report context.
Anything confirming/contradicting it: The key contradiction is Edmonds’ rep calling it “absurd.” No independent proof is presented in the intake.
Confidence level: Medium-Low (it’s a reported claim + denial, with limited verified documentation shown).

Production Reality Check
This isn’t a “project rumor,” it’s a documentation reality check: if this escalates, the next step is usually receipts — filings, reports, or direct evidence — not more quotes. Without that, it stays in the “he said / she said” lane publicly.

Does It Make Sense?
From a motive standpoint, bitter split dynamics can produce extreme behavior — but motive is not proof. The denial from Edmonds’ side also signals this could turn into a reputational fight where both camps dig in.

What to Watch Next

• Any verified documentation referenced publicly (court filings, confirmed police report excerpts, attorney statements).
• Whether either side threatens or files defamation-related action.
• If additional reporting confirms the identity of anyone connected to the harassment claims.

Verdict Box
Likelihood: Medium
Why: The allegation is being reported as something King claimed in a serious context, but it’s disputed and not independently proven in the info provided.

Sources

• TMZ — “Meghan King Claims Jim Edmonds Gave Her Number to Sex Workers…”
• Page Six — “‘RHOC’ alum Meghan King accuses ex Jim Edmonds of leaking her phone number to sex workers…”

Comment
What would you need to see to take a claim like this seriously — a filing, screenshots, a police report, or something else?