Topic / Subject
Katy Perry and Justin Trudeau “baby plans” chatter is making the rounds again, with outlets citing anonymous sources saying there’s no pregnancy — but claiming they’re “open to kids” down the line.

TL;DR
This is classic rumor recycling: “pregnant” goes viral, sources deny it, then the story pivots to “they’ve talked about it” so the gossip can keep breathing.

Key Details

• Per Cosmopolitan, sources say Katy Perry is not currently expecting a child with Justin Trudeau.
• Per Cosmopolitan, the same source-driven reporting claims they’re open to expanding their blended family in the future.
• Per Hindustan Times, there’s no official confirmation from either camp about any pregnancy.
• None of the “baby plans” details are confirmed on the record by Perry or Trudeau.

Breakdown
This is the celebrity rumor machine running its favorite play. Step one: a pregnancy claim gets traction because it’s shareable and easy to speculate about. Step two: anonymous sources pour cold water on it. Step three: the story morphs into something fuzzier that can’t be proven or disproven: “they’re open to kids.”

That last pivot is why these rumors never really die. “Not pregnant” is a dead end, but “open to kids someday” is infinite runway. It sounds plausible, it’s impossible to verify, and it keeps engagement humming without requiring any hard evidence.

It’s also worth noting the sourcing level here. These write-ups are not based on public statements, official reps, or documented reporting. They’re framed around “sources,” which means the claims should be treated as gossip, not news.

So the responsible read is simple: there’s no confirmed pregnancy, and any “family planning” talk is purely anonymous-source chatter until either party addresses it publicly.

How Credible Is This?
Low to Medium. The “not officially confirmed” piece is credible because it’s checkable. The “open to kids” angle is unverifiable and source-based.

Production Reality Check

• Pregnancy claims are the easiest rumor to generate and the hardest to responsibly report without official confirmation.
• “Open to kids” is not a verifiable fact in public reporting terms unless someone is quoted on the record.

Does It Make Sense?
As gossip content, yes: it’s sticky, personal, and endlessly clickable. As a concrete claim, it doesn’t rise above anonymous-source speculation.

What to Watch Next

• Any on-the-record statement from either side or their representatives.
• Whether reputable outlets with stronger sourcing add independent confirmation (or shut it down).
• If the rumor shifts again to a “spotted at X / timeline clues” cycle (typical next step).
• If the talk fades and resurfaces the next time either is publicly visible.

Sources
Cosmopolitan — Katy Perry and Justin Trudeau ‘Aren’t Against’ Starting a Family Together
Hindustan Times — Katy Perry, Justin Trudeau expecting first child together? Truth behind viral pregnancy claim
ELLE — Katy Perry and Justin Trudeau ‘Have Gotten Much More Serious’ in 2026

Comment
Do you treat pregnancy rumors as “ignore until official,” or do you think anonymous sourcing is enough to discuss them at all?